1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | Laser | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1983 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 162 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2550 mm |