1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (78 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 150 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Laser (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Laser | 2 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2500 mm |