1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 215 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (250 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Laser | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2760 mm |
