1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2004 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 231 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (196 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Chrysler | Volkswagen |
Model | Laser | Polo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 196 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1366 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2520 mm |