1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 80 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Laser | Clio |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |