1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Laser | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 4016 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 206 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 324 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3010 mm |
