1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 265 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Laser (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Laser | Colt |
Year Released | 1983 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |