1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Because 2009 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Laser | 2009 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Laser | XJ |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 297 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3040 mm |