1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (54 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 165 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Laser (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (100 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Laser | Colt |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 54 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2500 mm |
