1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2012 Mazda 6. (127 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2012 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 265 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 6 (340 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Laser | 6 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1795 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2789 mm |
