1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (143 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 310 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Laser. (217 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Laser | Equator |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3200 mm |
