1983 Chrysler Laser vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (71 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (125 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1983 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Laser | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | Laser | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2211 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
