1983 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 1155 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Le Baron | 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Le Baron | Camargue |
Year Released | 1983 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 107 L |