1983 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Jaguar S-Type
To start off, 2005 Jaguar S-Type is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,235 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 595 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2005 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Jaguar S-Type | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Le Baron | S-Type |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1795 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 70 L |