1983 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1656 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Ranger |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 64 L |