1983 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2008 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Le Baron | 2008 Jaguar XJ6 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Le Baron | XJ6 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 85 L |
