1983 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 301 kg more than 1983 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | 6 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 70 L |