1983 Chrysler Limousine vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chrysler Limousine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chrysler Limousine would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Limousine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1983 Chrysler Limousine. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1983 Chrysler Limousine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chrysler Limousine. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chrysler Limousine.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chrysler Limousine | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Limousine | Matrix |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2601 mm |