1983 Citroen BX vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1983 Citroen BX is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Citroen BX (72 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Citroen BX should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 211 kg more than 1983 Citroen BX.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Citroen BX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen BX. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1952 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen BX | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | BX | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1983 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 899 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2040 mm |