1983 Citroen BX vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen BX would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Patriot (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1983 Citroen BX. (72 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen BX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Patriot (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen BX. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen BX | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | BX | Patriot |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2634 mm |