1983 Citroen BX vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen BX would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1983 Citroen BX. (62 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 750 kg more than 1983 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford C-MAX (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen BX. (109 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen BX | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | BX | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1983 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 12.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 51 L |