1983 Citroen CX vs. 1980 Zastava 132

To start off, 1983 Citroen CX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 106 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Citroen CX weights approximately 130 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132.

Because 1980 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Citroen CX (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications:

1983 Citroen CX 1980 Zastava 132
Make Citroen Zastava
Model CX 132
Year Released 1983 1980
Engine Size 1995 cc 1756 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 159 Nm 143 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1225 kg 1095 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2560 mm