1983 Citroen CX vs. 1997 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1997 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1997 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda RX-7 (197 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1983 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen CX.
Because 1997 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda RX-7 (271 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen CX | 1997 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2430 mm |