1983 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1983 Citroen CX. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 480 kg more than 1983 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen CX. (206 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen CX | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | CX | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 206 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 74 L |