1983 Citroen CX vs. 2005 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2005 Nissan 350Z is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan 350Z (300 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1983 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 153 kg more than 1983 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan 350Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan 350Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan 350Z (359 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen CX. (206 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen CX | 2005 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | CX | 350Z |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 359 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1463 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |