1983 Citroen GSA vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1983 Citroen GSA is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Corona (74 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1983 Citroen GSA. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen GSA.
Because 1964 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen GSA | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | GSA | Corona |
Year Released | 1983 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 70 L |