1983 Citroen GSA vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2000 Ford e-Ka is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,758 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Ford e-Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford e-Ka (89 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Citroen GSA. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford e-Ka weights approximately 283 kg more than 1983 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen GSA | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | GSA | e-Ka |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1758 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2730 mm |