1983 Citroen GSA vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1983 Citroen GSA. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 475 kg more than 1983 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen GSA | 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | GSA | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 76 L |