1983 Citroen GSA vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,129 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Citroen GSA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart ForTwo (74 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1983 Citroen GSA. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Citroen GSA weights approximately 105 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2000 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Citroen GSA | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Citroen | Smart |
| Model | GSA | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1820 mm |
