1983 Citroen GSA vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 3,248 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (240 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1983 Citroen GSA. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 785 kg more than 1983 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen GSA | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | GSA | XJ |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 3248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |