1983 Citroen GSA vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1983 Citroen GSA. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 503 kg more than 1983 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Citroen GSA | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | GSA | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 228 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1428 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 61 L |
