1983 Citroen LN vs. 2000 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen LN would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1983 Citroen LN. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen LN. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1983 Citroen LN. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Citroen LN. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen LN | 2000 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Citroen | Mahindra |
Model | LN | Armada |
Year Released | 1983 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4310 mm |