1983 Citroen LN vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Citroen LN would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1983 Citroen LN. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen LN. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 1072 kg more than 1983 Citroen LN. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Citroen LN. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen LN. (50 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen LN.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen LN | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Citroen | Mahindra |
Model | LN | Bolero |
Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 652 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 50 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1782 kg |