1983 Citroen Visa vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1983 Citroen Visa is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1983 Citroen Visa. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1983 Citroen Visa.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Citroen Visa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Citroen Visa. (50 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Citroen Visa.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Citroen Visa | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Visa | 66 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 650 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 50 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |