1983 Daihatsu Charade vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (202 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (60 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Daihatsu Charade | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Charade | FTO |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
