1983 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (106 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Daihatsu Charade | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Charade | Ranger |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 59 L |