1983 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (60 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Daihatsu Charade | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Daihatsu | Holden |
Model | Charade | Epica |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 60 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2700 mm |