1983 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 721 kg more than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Daihatsu Charade. (106 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Daihatsu Charade | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Charade | C30 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 106 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |