1983 Datsun 280 vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 1983 Datsun 280 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Datsun 280 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Datsun 280 | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Datsun | Riley |
| Model | 280 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2753 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2870 mm |
