1983 Datsun 280 vs. 1992 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1992 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Datsun 280 (180 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1992 Ford Thunderbird. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 180 kg more than 1983 Datsun 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Thunderbird (291 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Datsun 280. (275 Nm). This means 1992 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Datsun 280.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Datsun 280 | 1992 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Datsun | Ford |
Model | 280 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1983 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2753 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 275 Nm | 291 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2880 mm |