1983 Datsun 280 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Datsun 280 (180 HP) has 97 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1983 Datsun 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Datsun 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Datsun 280 (275 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (122 Nm). This means 1983 Datsun 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Datsun 280 | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Datsun | Volkswagen |
Model | 280 | Polo |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2753 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 275 Nm | 122 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2470 mm |