1983 Datsun 280 vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1983 Datsun 280. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1983 Datsun 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Datsun 280 (275 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Ram. (235 Nm). This means 1983 Datsun 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Datsun 280 | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Datsun | Dodge |
| Model | 280 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2753 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 212 HP |
| Torque | 275 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2900 mm |
