1983 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 410 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1983 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | De Tomaso | Nissan |
Model | Longchamp | Cedric |
Year Released | 1983 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |