1983 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,762 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 1260 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 De Tomaso Longchamp | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Westfield |
Model | Longchamp | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 5762 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2320 mm |