1983 Dodge 600 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1983 Dodge 600 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1983 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 491 kg more than 1983 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge 600 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Dodge | Hudson |
| Model | 600 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3160 mm |
