1983 Dodge 600 vs. 1968 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1983 Dodge 600 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Cougar (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1983 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 235 kg more than 1983 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge 600 | 1968 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | 600 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |