1983 Dodge 600 vs. 2002 Holden Astra
To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Holden Astra (120 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1983 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Holden Astra should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge 600 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2002 Holden Astra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Holden Astra (165 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge 600. (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Holden Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge 600 | 2002 Holden Astra | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | 600 | Astra |
| Year Released | 1983 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 159 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |
