1983 Dodge 600 vs. 2005 Ford Puma
To start off, 2005 Ford Puma is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Puma (100 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1983 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge 600 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2005 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge 600 (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Puma. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge 600 | 2005 Ford Puma | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | 600 | Puma |
Year Released | 1983 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2450 mm |