1983 Dodge 600 vs. 2006 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2006 Jeep Commander is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 4,703 cc, 2006 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Commander (235 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1983 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Commander weights approximately 512 kg more than 1983 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Dodge 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Commander (414 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge 600. (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge 600 | 2006 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | 600 | Commander |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4703 cc |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 414 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1677 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2790 mm |