1983 Dodge 600 vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1983 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 345 kg more than 1983 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 6 (226 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Dodge 600. (159 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Dodge 600 | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 6 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2789 mm |